|
-
Making an Impact
“The Lone Star Project … hammers Republicans whenever it gets a chance, promoting strong local Democratic candidates and even bringing lawsuits.”
(Roll Call, Stuart Rothenberg,
March 12, 2009)
“Anyone who questions whether [The Lone Star Project] can make life difficult for a Republican legislator should talk to former Sen. Kim Brimer.”
(Austin American Statesman, February 17, 2009)
“[The Lone Star Project] is responsible for the aggressive stance the party has taken toward DeLay and other Lone Star State Republicans since the 2004 election.”
(The Washington Post, March 6, 2006)
"David Dewhurst has said most Texans don't have much sympathy "for someone who that can't fill out a two page [health insurance] application every six months".
The Democrat-supported Lone Star Project in Washington reported this week that Dewhurst failed to file necessary forms at least six times in recent years.
(San Antonio Expres News,, 4/12/2007)
"The Justice staff memo was obtained by the Lone Star Project ...The story broke the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was considering legal challenges to the plan brought by Democrats and minority groups."
(Houston Chronicle, 12/3/2005)
"The Texas chapter of the NAACP, along with the Lone Star Project, have analyzed the amicus brief filed by the Justice Department and have concluded, justifiably, that the Voting Rights section of the Justice Department is now controlled by partisan political appointees."
(Roll Call - Donna Brazile, 2/28/2006)
|
Tom DeLay: A Bully Takes a Coward’s Exit
Lone Star Project Sorts through Texas Election Code
Regarding DeLay Replacement
“It's just so contrary to what Texas is all about, to turn tail and run and not fight for what you believe in.”-Tom DeLay, (El Paso Times, May 14, 2003) in a now ironic comment criticizing Texas House members who broke quorum to block his redistricting scheme.
Tom DeLay will apparently leave Congress in the same shameful way he exercised power, acting like a bully who is above the law and a coward who wants to rig one last election. DeLay will leave the State of Texas bitterly divided along partisan lines, led by corrupt leaders like House Speaker Tom Craddick and Governor Rick Perry. From Sam Rayburn to George W. Bush, Texans crossed party lines to do what was best for our state and its people. First in Washington and then in Austin, Tom DeLay destroyed traditional bipartisanship and now leaves Texas in worse shape than he found it. As a result of DeLay’s corrupt redistricting scheme and the ethics scandal that surrounds him, Texas lost almost 100 years of seniority and high leadership positions in both parties. Now, rather than face the judgment of the voters in a race against an accomplished and ethical opponent, Tom DeLay has decided to “turn tail and run.”
Replacing a resigning Member of Congress is not a straightforward task. Read the Full Lone Star Project release in HTML or in a PDF
|
Assessing DeLay's Damage to Texas Congressional Clout
Congressional Redistricting and DeLay's
Ethics Problems Cost Texas Clout
While the media and politicians
typically focus on the partisan battles that take place in Congress, many
important decisions, particularly the appropriation of funds, are settled on a
regional basis where seniority and key committee leadership play an important
role. While Tom DeLay delivered a valuable political gift
to national Republicans with Texas redistricting, he placed a burden on
Texas citizens fighting for their fair share of federal
resources. In the process, he lost his own leadership position, put his
political career at risk, and squandered his ability to assist his home
state. DeLay’s most repeated quote, “I’m the Majority Leader, and I want
more seats” (Source: Washington Post, 1/19/2003) now has an ironic
twist. Republicans do indeed have more seats, but DeLay is no
longer the Leader and Texas voters no longer benefit from a powerful House
delegation in Congress.
Read the whole press release or view the pdf
|
Baseline Analysis of Texas Governor's Race
Strayhorn’s Task Harder and Bell’s Chances Better than Assumed
The unusual multi-candidate gubernatorial field in Texas has created an environment that may defy current conventional wisdom. Particularly, early observers may be overestimating the ability of Carole Strayhorn to garner a plurality of support in a potential four candidate field without the base of support that a party nomination provides. Conversely, although Chris Bell has raised relatively little money to date, he won the Democratic primary easily and has a voting record and political history virtually all Democrats, and some true independents, can embrace.
An analysis of the four-candidate field, based on projected voter turnout in 2006, shows that in order to compete and win, Strayhorn would have to run a campaign that simultaneously cuts deeply into the expected Republican vote that would otherwise go to Rick Perry AND cut significantly into the expected Democratic vote that would otherwise go to Bell. Gaining a little from both won’t work, and cutting deeply into one, but not the other, falls short as well.
The Lone Star Project developed a model to help forecast the election results for Texas Governor. An explanation of the model and the Lone Star Project’s conclusions are offered below. However, you can use the model to develop your own forecast online at the Lone Star Project Vote Simulator.
Read the rest of full release or in PDF
|
|