|
-
Making an Impact
“The Lone Star Project … hammers Republicans whenever it gets a chance, promoting strong local Democratic candidates and even bringing lawsuits.”
(Roll Call, Stuart Rothenberg,
March 12, 2009)
“Anyone who questions whether [The Lone Star Project] can make life difficult for a Republican legislator should talk to former Sen. Kim Brimer.”
(Austin American Statesman, February 17, 2009)
“[The Lone Star Project] is responsible for the aggressive stance the party has taken toward DeLay and other Lone Star State Republicans since the 2004 election.”
(The Washington Post, March 6, 2006)
"David Dewhurst has said most Texans don't have much sympathy "for someone who that can't fill out a two page [health insurance] application every six months".
The Democrat-supported Lone Star Project in Washington reported this week that Dewhurst failed to file necessary forms at least six times in recent years.
(San Antonio Expres News,, 4/12/2007)
"The Justice staff memo was obtained by the Lone Star Project ...The story broke the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was considering legal challenges to the plan brought by Democrats and minority groups."
(Houston Chronicle, 12/3/2005)
"The Texas chapter of the NAACP, along with the Lone Star Project, have analyzed the amicus brief filed by the Justice Department and have concluded, justifiably, that the Voting Rights section of the Justice Department is now controlled by partisan political appointees."
(Roll Call - Donna Brazile, 2/28/2006)
|
Perry/DeLay Will Set Modern Record for Vacant Texas Seat
Republican’s scheme will leave
TX-22 unrepresented more than four months
Teddy Roosevelt was President,
Butch Cassidy was alive and Lyndon Johnson had not yet been born the last time a
Texas congressional district was forced to go 130 days without knowing who
represented them in Congress.
It has been more than 100 years
since a Congressional District has been left without a Congressman for longer
than 130 Days. However, under the scheme hatched by Texas Governor Rick
Perry and surrendering former House Republican Leader Tom DeLay, citizens in the
22nd District of Texas will be left without any Member of Congress representing
them for at least 130 days, from June 30, 2006 until November 7, 2006.
This gap in representation could be even longer if DeLay resigns earlier in June
or if a run-off results from a November 7th special election, leaving the seat
open another 30 days.
DeLay/Perry Move Will Create Longest Vacancy Since
1905
Unlike DeLay, whose last chapter
will identify him as the guy who decided to quit and run, the last Texas Member
of Congress to cause such a long vacancy went out guns blazing –
literally. On April 24, 1905, the Congressman for the 8th District of
Texas, John M. Pinckney, was shot and killed at a meeting of the Waller County
Prohibition league. According to the man who killed Pinckney, “I heard a
shot behind me about 6- feet away and I turned and saw [Congressman] John M.
Pinckney shoot at papa. I turned around and shot at him 3-times.” (Source: Rockdale
Messenger, April, 27 1905). Pinkney had served in the
Confederate Army and as a County Judge before entering Congress. He was
succeeded by John M. Moore, a former State Representative from Fort Bend County
after a vacancy of 224 days. (Source: Handbook
of Texas Online)
Since then, whether congressional
vacancies occurred due to resignation or tragic death, an election was held to
fill the seat in less than 130 days and usually fairly soon after a district
lost its Member of Congress. (Source: Biographical Directory of the United States
Congress)
Read the rest of full release or in PDF
|
Pete Sessions Subject of DOJ Bribery Investigation Request
Lone Star Project Forecast Proves Accurate
As the Lone Star Project predicted in January, questionable official actions by Congressman Pete Sessions are now the subject of a formal request for investigation by the U.S. Justice Department. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a highly respected nonpartisan ethics watchdog organization, has filed a request for a formal investigation with
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales that details official actions taken by Pete Sessions that appear
to be in exchange for contributions to his congressional reelection campaign account and his leadership PAC. In its letter to the Attorney General, CREW states, “Rep. Sessions’ contacts with entities tied to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff and official actions he has taken on behalf of those entities raise serious issues of potential criminal activity and undermine the credibility of Rep. Sessions’ office and the U.S. House of Representatives.” (read the CREW Press Release)
After disclosing Sessions’ activities to assist the Malaysian government and lobbyists affiliated with convicted felon Jack Abramoff, the Lone Star Project predicted earlier this year that Sessions’ actions would be called into question. The Lone Star Project report led to several major press stories about the growing scandal. The principle concerns of the Lone Star Project were included in the CREW complaint. (Read the Original LSP Report)
Pete Sessions with John Mullen, Promia CEO and Ms. Linda Whittington, Navy SBIR |
New Evidence Shows More Improper Relationships
The CREW complaint includes a newer and perhaps more damaging complaint involving Sessions promoting a multimillion dollar appropriation for a California defense contractor, Promia Inc., in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars of donations to his reelection campaign and leadership PAC. Sessions actions on behalf of Promia Inc. and the corporation’s assistance to Sessions bear all the markings of an illegal “quid pro quo.”
Sessions Assistance to California Defense Contractor Arranged by a Former Staffer and Convicted Felon
Sessions contact with Promia Inc. was arranged by former Sessions’ staffer Adrian Plesha. The CREW complaint reveals that Plesha is a convicted felon who most recently pled guilty to felony perjury charges. Detailing the contributions Sessions received in exchange for his official actions, the CREW complaint states:
Rep. Sessions has advocated publicly for Promia and the nearly $800,000 Navy research and development contract the company was awarded in May 2000… Rep. Sessions received contributions of $1,000 each -- the maximum allowed by law -- from eight Promia executives for his re-election campaign. Promia executives contributed more to Rep. Sessions’ campaign than to any other candidate in that election cycle… In total, Promia and its executives have contributed nearly $55,000 to Rep. Sessions and his PAC since 2000 -- by far the largest contribution Promia has made to any Member of Congress.”
Read the CREW letter to Alberto Gonzalez
Read the CREW press release
See the CREW complaint exhibits
Read the original Lone Star Project Report |
|
Baseline Analysis of Texas Governor's Race
Strayhorn’s Task Harder and Bell’s Chances Better than Assumed
The unusual multi-candidate gubernatorial field in Texas has created an environment that may defy current conventional wisdom. Particularly, early observers may be overestimating the ability of Carole Strayhorn to garner a plurality of support in a potential four candidate field without the base of support that a party nomination provides. Conversely, although Chris Bell has raised relatively little money to date, he won the Democratic primary easily and has a voting record and political history virtually all Democrats, and some true independents, can embrace.
An analysis of the four-candidate field, based on projected voter turnout in 2006, shows that in order to compete and win, Strayhorn would have to run a campaign that simultaneously cuts deeply into the expected Republican vote that would otherwise go to Rick Perry AND cut significantly into the expected Democratic vote that would otherwise go to Bell. Gaining a little from both won’t work, and cutting deeply into one, but not the other, falls short as well.
The Lone Star Project developed a model to help forecast the election results for Texas Governor. An explanation of the model and the Lone Star Project’s conclusions are offered below. However, you can use the model to develop your own forecast online at the Lone Star Project Vote Simulator.
Read the rest of full release or in PDF
|
|