|
-
Making an Impact
“The Lone Star Project … hammers Republicans whenever it gets a chance, promoting strong local Democratic candidates and even bringing lawsuits.”
(Roll Call, Stuart Rothenberg,
March 12, 2009)
“Anyone who questions whether [The Lone Star Project] can make life difficult for a Republican legislator should talk to former Sen. Kim Brimer.”
(Austin American Statesman, February 17, 2009)
“[The Lone Star Project] is responsible for the aggressive stance the party has taken toward DeLay and other Lone Star State Republicans since the 2004 election.”
(The Washington Post, March 6, 2006)
"David Dewhurst has said most Texans don't have much sympathy "for someone who that can't fill out a two page [health insurance] application every six months".
The Democrat-supported Lone Star Project in Washington reported this week that Dewhurst failed to file necessary forms at least six times in recent years.
(San Antonio Expres News,, 4/12/2007)
"The Justice staff memo was obtained by the Lone Star Project ...The story broke the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was considering legal challenges to the plan brought by Democrats and minority groups."
(Houston Chronicle, 12/3/2005)
"The Texas chapter of the NAACP, along with the Lone Star Project, have analyzed the amicus brief filed by the Justice Department and have concluded, justifiably, that the Voting Rights section of the Justice Department is now controlled by partisan political appointees."
(Roll Call - Donna Brazile, 2/28/2006)
|
|
Lone Star All Stars go 7 for 9 Five
Democratic State House Pick-ups Surprise Skeptics
Six weeks ago, the Lone Star Project
identified nine Lone Star All Stars. The nine State House candidates were
running in tough, Republican leaning districts against well funded Republican
opponents. Six weeks later seven of those nine All Stars are now Texas
Representatives. (See the list below) Four of these new
Representatives beat Republican incumbents, while the other three held on
to open seats in Republican leaning districts. Respected Texas political
analyst Harvey Kronberg pointed out, "When they are sworn in next January,
Republicans will have lost more than half of their majority. Four years ago,
Republicans had a 13-vote majority in the Texas House. Now it is six." (News 8
Austin, 11/13/2006)
Some may assume that legislative and
congressional gains in Texas are the product of a national wave of support for
Democrats in the 2006 elections. However, most political writers have
pointed out that Texas Democrats faced a more skeptical public and ran against
well funded Republican opponents in Republican leaning districts. To put
the successes in context, here are some key facts to remember when considering
the 2006 elections in Texas.
Texas Democrats
began the cycle at a political disadvantage
- Texas State House and Congressional
Districts are the result of Republican partisan gerrymanders. Most of the
contested districts were drawn "for Republicans by Republicans" with the intent
for a Republican candidate to hold the seat in the event of an otherwise "bad
year" for Republicans. (Source: Austin American-Statesman, 2/26/2006)
- All seats captured by Democrats had
a Democratic performance index far below 50 percent. Not a single district
was carried by either Al Gore in '00 or John Kerry in '04. (Source: Secretary of
State)
- Incumbents are tough to beat.
Four of the five Democrats who captured Republican seats beat sitting
incumbents who were better funded and were able to use incumbency to prop up
their campaigns.
Smart money
beat more money
- There was virtually no national
money in Texas. While the DNC funded three field staffers for the Texas
Democratic Party and the DCCC spent modestly in CD22 (Lampson) and in CD17
(Edwards), the national Democratic party committees did not help fund any
base turnout activity, voter file development or make direct contributions
to candidates or local parties. (Source: Federal Elections Commission, Texas
Ethics Commission)
- Republican financiers James
Leininger, who gave $3.5 million, and Bob Perry, who gave $2.7 million, along
with Tom Craddick's PAC Stars Over Texas, moved hundreds of thousands of dollars
into key State House Districts in the closing weeks of the campaign.
(Houston Chronicle, 11/12/2006)
- The Texas Democratic Party and the
House Democratic Campaign Committee stuck to a disciplined and highly targeted
program to maximize Democratic base vote in key districts and to make targeted
contributions designed to help candidates complete their individual campaign
programs. Republicans spent more money, but Democrats used fewer dollars
more wisely.
The Lone Star Project
has provided a line-up of the new, and very impressive, Democrats who won hotly
contested State House and Congressional
seats.
|
| |
|
The Lone Star Project is an activity of the Lone Star Fund.
Contributions to this committee are not tax deductible. Federal law requires political committees to use our best efforts to report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer for each individual whose contributions exceed $200 in a calendar year. The Lone Star Fund accepts federal contributions from individuals, partnerships, and other federal political committee of up to $5,000 per calendar year.

|