Lone Star Project
AboutSign UpContributeArchivesHome
Lone Star Project

Lone Star Project on Facebook


-

Making an Impact

“The Lone Star Project … hammers Republicans whenever it gets a chance, promoting strong local Democratic candidates and even bringing lawsuits.”
(Roll Call, Stuart Rothenberg,
March 12, 2009)


“Anyone who questions whether [The Lone Star Project] can make life difficult for a Republican legislator should talk to former Sen. Kim Brimer.”
(Austin American Statesman, February 17, 2009)


“[The Lone Star Project] is responsible for the aggressive stance the party has taken toward DeLay and other Lone Star State Republicans since the 2004 election.”
(The Washington Post, March 6, 2006)

 

"David Dewhurst has said most Texans don't have much sympathy "for someone who that can't fill out a two page [health insurance] application every six months".

The Democrat-supported Lone Star Project in Washington reported this week that Dewhurst failed to file necessary forms at least six times in recent years.
(San Antonio Expres News,, 4/12/2007)


"The Justice staff memo was obtained by the Lone Star Project ...The story broke the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was considering legal challenges to the plan brought by Democrats and minority groups."
(Houston Chronicle, 12/3/2005)


"The Texas chapter of the NAACP, along with the Lone Star Project, have analyzed the amicus brief filed by the Justice Department and have concluded, justifiably, that the Voting Rights section of the Justice Department is now controlled by partisan political appointees."
(Roll Call - Donna Brazile, 2/28/2006)

 

 

Democrats ask Judge to Ensure a Fair Recount
Republican Secretary of State Attempting Partisan Power Play

Today Texas Democrats asked a Dallas District Judge to require recount officials to follow state law and ensure every valid vote in the House District 105 (Irving) election is counted. This action was required after Secretary of State Hope Andrade sent a memo, with obvious partisan intent, directing Dallas Election Officials to disregard state law requiring straight ticket ballots to be counted in all races where a candidate of another party is not selected.

Read the Lawsuit here

Pending the recount, incumbent Republican Linda Harper-Brown is just 20 votes ahead of the Democrat Bob Romano in the HD105 tally. Republicans are worried that 20 vote lead will evaporate if all the legal ballots are counted. Harper-Brown is a staunch ally of embattled Speaker Tom Craddick, whose grip on the Speaker’s post is tenuous regardless of the outcome in HD105. However, Harper-Brown’s race is the only thing keeping the Texas House from being evenly divided with 75 Democrats and 75 Republicans. Read more about Harper-Brown’s harsh partisan past here.

Secretary of State Does Partisan Flip Flop on Ballot Counting Instructions
In a memo dated October 31, 2008, Ann McGeehan, Director of Elections in the Secretary of State’s office, directed County Clerks/Elections Administrators to count so-called “emphasis votes” involving straight party votes properly under state law, stating:

“An individual vote for a candidate in the same column as a straight-party mark is regarded as an “emphasis” vote and does not invalidate the straight-party mark. If the only individual votes are emphasis votes, the vote is tallied the same as a straight-party vote without regard to the emphasis votes.”

However, in a blatantly partisan memo sent to the Dallas County Elections Administrator Bruce Sherbet on November 20, 2008, Ms. McGeehan offered a different opinion in direct contradiction to her October 31 instructions. The HD105 recount committee was instructed to interpret “emphasis votes” as an attempt by the voter to intentionally “deselect” the candidate of the same party for whom both a straight party vote and an individual vote was cast, meaning straight party votes would not count for those individual candidates. Ms. McGeehan attempted to justify her reversal by using a case involving the way electronic voting machines function, instead of simply following the law to ascertain the voter’s intent and properly count all ballots.

Democrats insisting on fairness
Democrats are only asking for a fair election and recount, conducted under existing state law, to make sure valid votes are counted and invalid votes are not, but Republicans are obviously focused on protecting Harper-Brown at any cost.

There is no assurance that even if a proper recount is conducted that Democrat Bob Romano will prevail. However, win or lose, Democrats believe that every valid vote must be counted and state law must be followed as written, not as interpreted by partisan election officials.



 

 

 
 
AboutSign UpContributeArchivesHome

 

 

The Lone Star Project is an activity of the Lone Star Fund.

Contributions to this committee are not tax deductible.  Federal law requires political committees to use our best efforts to report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer for each individual whose contributions exceed $200 in a calendar year.  The Lone Star Fund accepts federal contributions from individuals, partnerships, and other federal political committee of up to $5,000 per calendar year.

Disclaimer