|


-
Making an Impact
The suit, filed against Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott... accuses Abbott of targeting minority voters in his prosecution of the provisions in a "deliberate campaign to suppress the minority vote."...
The group behind the lawsuit is the Lone Star Project
(Fort Worth Star-Telegram, 9/22/2006)
The Democrats at the Lone Star Project say U.S. Attorney General Al Gonzales and U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton in San Antonio blew their chance to bring justice to the Texas Youth Commission sexual abuse case.
(Houston Chronicle Blog, 3/15/2007)
David Dewhurst has said most Texans don't have much sympathy "for someone who that can't fill out a two page [health insurance] application every six months".
The Democrat-supported Lone Star Project in Washington reported this week that Dewhurst failed to file necessary forms at least six times in recent years.
(San Antonio Expres News,, 4/12/2007)
The Justice staff memo was obtained by the Lone Star Project ...The story broke the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was considering legal challenges to the plan brought by Democrats and minority groups.
(Houston Chronicle, 12/3/2005)
The Texas chapter of the NAACP, along with the Lone Star Project, have analyzed the amicus brief filed by the Justice Department and have concluded, justifiably, that the Voting Rights section of the Justice Department is now controlled by partisan political appointees.
(Roll Call - Donna Brazile, 2/28/2006)
Using the Lone Star Project as an information clearinghouse for all things DeLay. The organization "particularly became relevant as the unethical activities of Tom DeLay came more to light."
(The Fix – Washington Post,3/6/2006)
What's more, the relevant 73-page memo "has been kept under tight wraps" since then. That memo is now publicly available, here in PDF at the Lone Star Project.
(Hotline, 12/2/2005)
|
|
|
|
(202) 547-7610
- Fax (202)547-8258 March 3, 2006 Contact: Matt
Angle On the web at www.LoneStarProject.net
Assessing DeLay's Damage to Texas Congressional Clout
Congressional Redistricting and DeLay's
Ethics Problems Cost Texas Clout
While the media and politicians
typically focus on the partisan battles that take place in Congress, many
important decisions, particularly the appropriation of funds, are settled on a
regional basis where seniority and key committee leadership play an important
role. While Tom DeLay delivered a valuable political gift
to national Republicans with Texas redistricting, he placed a burden on
Texas citizens fighting for their fair share of federal
resources. In the process, he lost his own leadership position, put his
political career at risk, and squandered his ability to assist his home
state. DeLay's most repeated quote, "I'm the Majority Leader, and I want
more seats" (Source: Washington Post, 1/19/2003) now has an ironic
twist. Republicans do indeed have more seats, but DeLay is no
longer the Leader and Texas voters no longer benefit from a powerful House
delegation in Congress.
Before At the close of the 108th
Congress, the 32-Member Texas U.S. House Delegation stood as a testament to
legendary House Speaker Sam Rayburn's recipe for congressional clout, "Pick 'em
right, elect 'em young and keep 'em there." Before DeLay's remap the Texas
delegation:
- had accrued 347 years of
seniority,
- held 2 House leadership positions,
- claimed 4 full committee Chair or
Ranking Member positions.
- ranked 2nd in state clout only
behind much larger California.
After However, after just one election
under DeLay's new map, Texas voters immediately lost 85 years of seniority and 3
powerful Ranking Members of Congress. When Tom DeLay resigned his
post as Majority Leader because of his ongoing legal problems,
Texas was left without any congressmen with leadership
positions for the first time since 1992 and for only the second time
since 1977.
|
|
Dec.
2003
|
Jan.
2004
|
Power
Lost |
|
Texas Seniority |
347 years |
262 years |
85
years |
|
Party Leadership
Posts |
2 |
0* |
2 |
|
Chairs/Ranking
Members |
4 |
1 |
3 | * As of 9/28/2005
Loss in
State Rank After the DeLay redistricting map, Texas fell in
rank of congressional clout among major States. New York,
though holding fewer total seats in Congress than Texas, blew by Texas
in total years of seniority and in key committee
positions. (Source: Roll Call, 1/24/2005) Other large
states such as Michigan, Illinois, Florida, and Ohio gained ground on Texas and
relative influence among large state delegations with many states holding more
leadership posts and powerful committee positions.
|
|
Seniority |
Average Seniority per
Member |
Leadership
Posts
|
Chairs/Ranking Members of
Committees |
|
California |
632 |
11.9 |
4 |
6 |
|
New York |
356 |
12.3 |
2 |
2 |
|
Texas |
262 (3 of 7) |
8.2 (last) |
0 (last) |
1 (6 of 7,
tie) |
|
Florida |
230 |
9.2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Michigan |
236 |
15.7 |
0 |
2 |
|
Illinois |
191 |
10.1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Ohio |
218 |
12.1 |
2 |
1 |
- Ranking out of 7
in parentheses
The Future Under Republican Conference rules
Texas's only Committee Chair, Joe Barton, must give up his chairmanship of the
Commerce Committee after the next session of Congress. While the 2006
elections have yet to play themselves out, it is certainly possible that
Democrats could win a majority in the U.S. House. Recent generic polls
show Democrats with a leads ranging from 14% to 16%
percent. (Source: CNN/USA Today/Gallop 3/10/06
and 2/28/06) However, because redistricting removed Texas's
senior Democrats and ranking members, no Texas Democrat is in place to move into
a leadership position or Chair a major Committee. Under virtually any
scenario, Texans will end the next session of Congress without a single
leadership position, committee chairmanship or ranking committee post.
Roundup There is no question that Tom
DeLay's unprecedented mid-decade redistricting decimated congressional Democrats
in Texas. It's also clear that DeLay's map saved Republicans the
embarrassment of losing U.S. House seats nationally in 2004. However,
Texans of all political stripes paid a big price in
congressional clout when Rick Perry and the Republican legislature
collapsed to DeLay's demand that senior, moderate, well-placed and influential
Democrats be exchanged for harshly partisan, inexperienced freshmen
Republicans. |
| |
|